opinion | Readers slam The Post: Iga Swiatek’s French Open win deserves more attention

Placeholder whereas loading article actions

Every week, The Put up runs a batch of reader complaints letters – noting grammatical errors, lacking protection, and inconsistencies. These messages inform us what we have carried out flawed and, at instances, reward us. Right here, we’re providing free messaging to everybody for this week.

Relating to the June 5 sports activities articleSwiatek simply sends Gauff into the ultimate“:

I do not know Billie Jean King, however I really feel relieved that she is going to share my disappointment with the dimensions of actual property on the entrance web page within the sports activities part of this yr’s French Open Ladies’s Iga Sweetek, on June 5. The picture and textual content on the again web page deserved to be within the foreground greater than what was printed.

Right here we have now our heroine who performed an incredible match towards Coco Gauff (an incredible participant in her personal proper), received her second Roland Garros title, retained her standing because the No. 1 participant on this planet, and continued her match profitable streak. to 35.

I am simply not clear how her achievement in a serious sport will get much less consideration than Viewpoint For somebody who hasn’t received something noticeable in ages.

Please, we’re imagined to make progress in direction of equality on this planet of sport, amongst different issues.

Laurie LiebermanAnd the Alexandria

There are Republicans within the capital too

The Washington Put up’s doctrine, “Democracy dies at midnight,” doesn’t seem to use to its protection of political campaigns for elected workplace or endorsement of candidates within the District of Columbia.

Within the Could 15 openingMayor of the capital metropolis“Chairmen of Mayor Muriel E. Bowser urged to “re-elect her for a 3rd time period.” Endorsement of D.C. Delegate to the U.S. Home of Representatives [“For D.C. delegate,” editorial, May 23] “We urge voters to deliver Mrs. Norton again into the Home,” she stated.

Generally, the Democratic Social gathering’s main endorsement has referred to as for incumbents to be “reelected.” Does this imply that the editorial board is intent on ignoring the truth that the Republican Social gathering in DC has candidates in search of nominations for mayor, delegate, council president, basic council member, and different workplaces? Subsequent editorials ought to inform voters that these endorsements are for the Democratic Social gathering’s nominations and that the winners will face Republican candidates in November.

Nelson RimmensnaiderAnd the Washington

The author is a Republican candidate for the place of Washington’s delegate to the US Home of Representatives.

Is it a republic or a democracy? sure!

In response to the June 4 message Free for all “Republic, if KidsPost can holdI have to ask how the author defines his phrases. He says we reside in a non-democratic republic. What definition of democracy does he use? “Direct democracy” signifies that residents vote instantly on each legislation? No nation on this planet has such a system. Or consultant democracy, which signifies that voters instantly elect representatives who make selections for them (which we clearly have as we speak)?

It’s true that the framers of the structure linked the phrase “democracy” to mob rule. However additionally it is true that by “republic” they imply a constitutional consultant democracy – that’s, a constitutional system that features oblique majority rule, with limits on authorities energy and safety of minority rights. So when individuals assert that we reside in a republic, not a democracy, it’s a contradiction in phrases, as a result of the republic they created was then, much more as we speak than it was in 1787, a type of democracy.

If the query is “Will we reside in a republic or a democracy?” , the reply is “each”.

Though I very a lot disagree with George F. Will, I’m an avid reader of his article.

Nevertheless, I used to be dissatisfied that his Could twenty ninth article “Biden’s presidential scorecard in 500 days“comprises a notable, and apparently willful, omission. In an try to say that federal laws regarding elections to Congress can be, in his phrases, a “federal expropriation from the states of the constitutional accountability to conduct the elections,” citing Article 1, Part 4 of the Structure, which It offers the state legislatures energy to prescribe “the instances, locations, and method of conducting elections for senators and representatives.”

Will’s quote ended there. However the the rest of Part 4 reads, “However Congress might at any time by legislation make or amend such bylaws, besides with respect to locations for choice of Senators.”

Will is best than that.

Charles W. blahAnd the silver spring

D-Day isn’t just one other day

I regarded in useless on the June 6 concern of The Put up to see one thing to commemorate D-Day, which occurred 78 years in the past. No luck! It appears as if D-Day is fading into oblivion. We had a variety of casualties that day, and it was a really costly victory, one which shouldn’t be forgotten. Let’s do higher on the 79th Anniversary!

The author is a veteran of World Struggle II.

In his evaluate of Jeff Nussbaum’s Undelivered: The By no means Heard Letters That Would Rewrite Historical past, historian Douglas Brinkley referred to the letter ready by Common Dwight Eisenhower within the occasion the Normandy landings failed in 1944—or, Brinkley penned it, if The invasion turns right into a Dunkirk episode [“In undelivered speeches, history’s alternate paths,” Outlook, June 5].

However the well-known Battle of Dunkirk was the antithesis of the failed invasion. The profitable evacuation of British troops from France was in 1940. The phrase “boondoggle” means, based on Merriam-Webster, “a challenge or wasteful or impractical exercise typically involving graft.” If the Normandy invasion had failed and Hitler had stored his maintain on Western Europe, this could have been a catastrophe or a tragedy, maybe, however it’s definitely not impenetrable.

Paul BodroAnd the Tacoma Park

I do know the insurance policies round reporting individuals’s ages in information articles and images have seemingly modified in recent times, however wanting on the captions on entrance web page images on Could 31, I am having bother understanding The Put up’s insurance policies. The caption for the highest photograph, of three ladies in a flower store in Ovaldi, Texas, included the ages of all three ladies. Since all three ladies are clearly adults, their precise ages don’t appear to be very related within the image. The caption for the second photograph on the entrance web page of two males in Buffalo, UT, didn’t embrace the boys’s ages.

What’s the message right here? Why is it vital to publish the ages of ladies and never males? The Washington Put up’s insurance policies look like inconsistent at greatest, and sexist at worst.

Carol RadomskyAnd the silver spring

A Vital Distinction When It Involves “Precise Hate”

June 3 type article coping with the end result of Johnny Depp’s defamation lawsuit towards Amber Heard [“Why Depp won in U.S. but not in U.K.”] Inaccurately described the American authorized normal of the supremacy of a public determine in a libel swimsuit.

The article said that to satisfy the criterion of “precise malice” (adopted by the Supreme Court docket in a 1964 resolution New York Occasions v. Sullivan), the plaintiff should show that the defendant knew that “the defamatory assertion was unfaithful when it was made.” This erred within the check set by the Supreme Court docket, which states {that a} plaintiff might get better whether or not the defendant (1) knew the assertion was false, or (2) acted with reckless disregard for whether or not the assertion was true. This can be a crucial distinction, with important implications. For instance, if a media entity spreads a lie with out doing due diligence to find out the reality of the assertion, it may be legally uncovered underneath the usual of precise malice.

John S. Ross IIIAnd the Holden, Mass.

The author is a constitutional legislation trainer at Assumption College.

Getting the flawed concept about academics and summer time trip

I get the that means of Joe Heller on June 7 editorial graphics It was related to the insane battlefields the faculties become – figuratively and actually, sadly. Nevertheless, I have to object to the misunderstanding many individuals have: academics and summer time trip!

To start with, I do not know of any public faculty system (and I’ve by no means heard of a non-public faculty both) that offers academics a 3 month break (not like some schools). Right here in Montgomery County, it takes eight weeks at most, not 12. And theOpposite to individuals’s largest misunderstanding, academics are out of labor throughout these eight weeks. And theSince academics are contract staff, they can not accumulate unemployment (not like auto employees who’ve been historically “laid off” whereas retooling meeting traces to supply a brand new mannequin).

Actually, I actually preferred the animation and thought it was very acceptable and related. I want Heller had written “two months” as a substitute of “three” months.

Leslie BackusAnd the silver spring

The author is a retired science trainer.

This ‘comic’ ought to have gotten the hook

Sorry, however I did not discover something humorous about how tough it’s for a lot of amputees to dress, Could 31 subject”Rhymes with orangeComedy tape. I discovered the tape notably tasteless the day after Memorial Day, after we honor those that have fallen in battle.

William B. WinterAnd the silver spring

Expelling a reporter might result in concern of talking out

Relating to the June 10 type article “Postal reporter who criticized the newspaper on-line has been fired“:

As a subscriber, I’m aggravated by the dismissal of Felicia Sonmez. In my opinion, her dismissal has broken The Put up’s popularity greater than any public feedback Sonmez has made. It is irritating that The Put up has fired her. I discover it’s extra seemingly that different staff have skilled the problems you raised, and firing them will result in a tradition of concern fairly than a spirit of fellowship. The Put up’s staff could also be much less prone to communicate out about injustice within the newspaper, and good, trustworthy reporting is extra prone to undergo. I worth reviews by individuals with the ability to show the errors of the highly effective, and I recognize management that listens to the opposition fairly than crushes it. Please exhibit the power of character wanted to run a first-class newspaper and make use of its again.

Emily SeveranceAnd the Peña Blanca, New Mexico

There have to be some excellent news, proper?

It’s encouraging that there are far fewer instances that we have now to see the identify and photograph of a former president on web page after web page of The Put up. Nevertheless, the very destructive and unhappy parts within the information lately have elevated with 4 destructive articles about President Biden within the first 4 pages of the June 5 concern. Then there was Michael de Adair’s editorial cartoon About Biden’s lack of political capital. Is there nothing that might be constructive and inspiring about this president? I discover that tough to consider.

Marcia HojstraAnd the Washington

Thanks for not alerting us to this spoiler

Relating to e book evaluate on June fifth”The cinematic story of a French baron kidnapped with a severed finger” [Outlook]:

Jonathan Kirsch, who reviewed the true crime thriller “The Final Baron: The Paris Kidnapping that introduced down an empire” by Tom Sancton, did a wonderful job of telling the story of the 1978 kidnapping of Baron Edward Jean Empain with out letting the reader know the way the sufferer finally succeeded. Actually, Kirsch ended his evaluate by writing, “Above all else, it is a completely genuine thriller. Because of this, and out of respect for the creator and his readers, the conclusion can’t be revealed right here.” Sadly, the evaluate was accompanied by a photograph of Empain arriving at a hospital in Paris after, after kidnapping. Effectively, I believe he survived his ordeal. Thanks for spoiling the ending.

Sarah DownsAnd the Woodway, Tex.

We now have greater than sufficient

Cease the atrocities of the varsity capturing and declare that ‘that’s sufficient,’ as said within the Could 31 letter to the editorWhy is america completely different?“Sufficient” signifies that some have been unwell, even sick. The college shootings or different atrocities have been by no means “sufficient”.

George HoskinAnd the Burtonsville

Some clarifications on the definition of “mass capturing”.

Within the June 5 version of The Put up, Glenn Kessler wrote that there have been 4 mass shootings this yr, primarily based on the definition included in Kessler’s fact-checker column, “What analysis exhibits concerning the effectiveness of gun management legal guidelines for a mass ceasefire. On the editorial web page, The Put up has indicated that there have been greater than 232 mass shootings in 2022 thus far [“Our hands aren’t tied”]. I perceive that the definition of “mass capturing” varies relying on the group accumulating the information, however this discrepancy appears unreasonably massive and contradictory. The very fact-checker famous that there are not less than eight databases that monitor mass shootings. Can the newspaper clarify to readers what the numbers are, who collects the information, the completely different definitions, and so forth.? And thanks for overlaying this crucial concern.